|
|
Edouard wrote:
> SharkD <mik### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
>> On 6/4/2010 5:31 PM, Edouard wrote:
>>> "Edouard"<pov### [at] edouardinfo> wrote:
>>>
>>> Opps - I mean:
>>>
>>> #macro halton2D( n )
>>> #local baseX = 2;
>>> #local baseY = 3;
>>>
>>> < halton( n, baseX ), halton( n, baseY ), 0>
>>> #end
>>
>> Could you provide an example of how to use it? Thanks.
>
> I'll try!
>
> The halton macro returns a number from 0..1, and halton2D() returns a vector
> where the X is 0..1, Y is 0..1 and the Z = 0.
>
> You call halton2D() with an incrementing integer, so it works best in a loop.
>
> If you had a macro called PlaceTree(), you could loop through values from
> halton2D calling the tree macro like this:
>
> #declare n = 1;
> #while( n < number_of_trees_wanted )
> #declare position = halton2D( n );
> // position is <0..1, 0..1, 0> - scale the vector here
> // to the size you need for PlaceTree
> PlaceTree( position )
> #declare n = n + 1;
> #end
>
> Does my explanation make sense?
>
> Cheers,
> Edouard.
>
>
This is very useful! I see that the increasing integer eliminates the
overlap of points. Is there a relationship between the size of the
object and the size of the increment that can be used to prevent
objects intersecting?
Post a reply to this message
|
|