Darren New wrote:

> Heck, for that matter anything returning a zero-length array would pass. 
> OK, to be *comprehensive*, you would have to add that the result is a 
> permutation of the original. You could do this by counting how many 
> times each original value occurs in the list and making sure it occurs 
> in the result the same number of times.

Let's hope Warp doesn't ask us to test for a *stable* sort...

Post a reply to this message