Chris Cason <del### [at] deletethistoopovrayorg> wrote:
> > If the official stance of the POV-team is that compilers with C++0x  
> > features enabled are not (yet) supported, then that is fine. At least it  

> Our official stance is that we support what our source code pages say we
> support. You can read into that what you wish.

  I honestly cannot understand what is deemed so problematic here.

  After all, the solution to the problem presented in the original post is
quite simple: Use a fully qualified shared_ptr (iow. "boost::shared_ptr").
Even if both boost and std have the same "shared_ptr", it doesn't matter:
If you fully qualify it, it will be unambiguous. You don't need compiler-
specific settings or outright dropping support for a compiler which
implements things in the new C++ standard, and blaming such compilers for
"breaking boost".

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message