On 01/06/2010 6:22 AM, Jim Henderson wrote:
> On Mon, 31 May 2010 15:47:46 -0600, somebody wrote:
>
>> "Neeum Zawan"<m.n### [at] ieeeorg>  wrote in message
>> news:4c03fa31$1@news.povray.org...
>>
>>> http://www.allheadlinenews.com/articles/7018797035
>>
>> It's a little surreal that the SC can still imply it's a given that
>> blacks will not do well when tested fairly alongside whites when the
>> residing president is black.
>
> Just because the sitting president is black doesn't mean we've achieved
> equality everywhere in the country.
>
> There are still parts of the country where the divide in education is
> very strongly pronounced along racial lines because of differences in
> schools where the predominant race of students is black vs. schools where
> the predominant race of the students is white.
>
> To suggest that having a black president makes everything equal now
> everywhere is just a bit of a straw man.
>

Yes, just because one man from a minority reaches the top. (Talking 
about the supreme court) It doesn’t mean that he thinks that the rest of 
the minority have an equal opportunity to do the same.

-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message