On 30.05.10 20:40, Warp wrote:
>> As said, there is no problem as long as new experimental compiler features
>> are not enabled. There are actually C++ macros that return the version that
>> is being compiled against. I would argue that it might be a good idea to
>> check this version and refuse to preprocess if the required version is not set.
>
>    You are seriously suggesting that instead of removing "using namespace std;"
> and "using namespace boost;", the code should use some non-standard macro
> checks and refuse to compile if they do not have a certain value?
>
>    Have you gone completely mad?

See, I don't have to get mad and jump up and down after I misinterpreted 
some statement because of lack of background knowledge. I just have to know 
that "__cplusplus" is a standard macro defined for exactly the purpose I 
stated :-)

     Thorsten


PS: This incident beggs the rhetoric question if I did not just a few 
minutes ago predict that you start arguments over misinterpretations exactly 
like the one above...

Post a reply to this message