Darren New wrote:
> Moved from beta-test to off-topic, where the resulting flame fest will
> be amusing rather than annoying. ;-)
> 
> Thorsten Froehlich wrote:
>> Supporting draft standard features by default is extremely poor
>> practice, or more precisely, a serious product defect.
> 
> Yet, oddly enough, not supporting draft standards in a web browser is a
> *bad* thing. Funny that.
> 

Haven't you heard? It is better to support a draft standard and patent
littered codecs, than it is to support a fixed standard that is trying
to go open-source.

Post a reply to this message