>> So have you got any further with it yet? ;-)
> 
> Yep.
> 
> I have the wiring completed now. I'm posting a new exe soon. I was kind 
> of hoping to get your opinions of the UI as I move forward.

You probably want to start a new thread when you do... This subthread is 
fairly deeply burried. But sure, I'll look at it.

> I'm trying to keep the app as flexible as possible without being 
> unwieldy. The simulation core need some serious work, though.

I could point out several things I dislike about LogiSim that I hope you 
can avoid doing - but I think I'll just wait and see what you *have* 
done and comment on that. ;-)

> I'm just hoping the people that download the app when it's complete 
> won't roast me for using the .NET framework like they did on the other 
> .NET app.

I've got a VM with .NET on it now, so it should be fairly easy to test.

> Also, probably due for a rename when it's more final judging by the 
> similarity of the name of LogiSim. I created the project before I 
> searched for other similar projects. That's how I found LogiSim in the 
> first place. Shame on me. ;)

Well, let's see, you're writing a *logic* *simulator*. You might take a 
wild guess that similar existing products will have names consisting of 
some contraction of these two words... ;-)

It's like writing a Mandelbrot generator and calling it MandelPlot or 
something. I wouldn't be surprised at all if somebody has already taken 
that name.

Call it something random like POV-Wire or something. :-D

Post a reply to this message