On 05/23/10 07:39, Jim Charter wrote:
>>     They performed worse than those who weren't offered an award, or
>> offered a low award.
>>
> I see so the reward is not based on performance or achievements after
> the fact but rather it is paid in the hope of getting high performance
> or achievements which never pan out.

	Um, perhaps. Not sure I'm parsing you correctly.

	The point is that offering a larger sum to get the job done led to
lower performance (slower, etc) for tasks that require more advanced
thinking.

-- 
Fax me no questions, I'll Fax you no lies!

Post a reply to this message