Neeum Zawan wrote:
> On 05/22/10 08:46, Jim Charter wrote:
>> Darren New wrote:
>>> watch at least the first minute of this.
>>>
>>> http://comment.rsablogs.org.uk/2010/04/08/rsa-animate-drive/
>>>
>>> It's an interesting talk anyway, and over in 10 minutes, so it's worth
>>> watching.
>> I don't understand the experiment.  What does he mean "people offered
>> the high reward" did poorly.  Does that mean no one actually received
>> the high reward? I'm confused.
> 
> 	They performed worse than those who weren't offered an award, or
> offered a low award.
> 
I see so the reward is not based on performance or achievements after 
the fact but rather it is paid in the hope of getting high performance 
or achievements which never pan out.

Post a reply to this message