> BTW, I just had a look at the Windows front-end code, to find that it 
> would be quite easy to change it to use a prettier scaling method - all it 
> would take would be to change a scaling-mode constant, and slightly adjust 
> some code called whenever an SMP square has been rendered.

That's what I thought.

> However, that change would apparently break compatibility with Windows 
> 95/98/Me; I don't think such a minor improvement would be worth that 
> price.

Couldn't it be a variable rather than a constant, set by a simple check for 
OS version?

Post a reply to this message