>>> Yes. That's why DEL is up at 127. Think about it.
>>
>> Oh... oh dear god. You *are* kidding me, right??
> 
> He is not. It the smart thing to do. Is it not?

But the really scary part, of course, is that today, 60 years later, the 
DEL code-point is *still defined* and still has the same value. WTF is 
up with *that*?!

Post a reply to this message