|
|
>> It still slightly frightens me that Haskell is actually this old...
>> Just think how much better the world could be today if its ideas had
>> caught on back then?
>
> A lot of the stuff you take for granted wasn't possible back then.
>
> It's like "how much cooler would movies be if the ideas behind modern
> GPUs caught on back when we were still using discrete transistors and
> core memory?"
A GPU isn't much use without the ability to actually display the image
it produces. (Hell, they didn't even have enough memory to implement a
framebuffer. You'd have to print the image on to film incrimentally or
something.) And given that they also didn't have colour TV yet... or
even colour film, IIRC...
A paradigm for writing mathematical transformations, however, would seem
useful no matter how slow the system is. (Although compiling the sucker
might take a while.)
Post a reply to this message
|
|