Paul Fuller wrote:
> I'm getting the impression that 'Invisible' is a large pile of match
> boxes filled with random numbers of beans. Every now and then he/it
> makes an interesting observation followed by often incorrect statements.
>
> We are gradually teaching he/it about the Universe.
>
> One day true match box intelligence will rise up. I expect it to be
> speaking Haskell.
By that definition, it might have risen up already. Speaking Haskell,
who would know the difference? :-P
Post a reply to this message
|