Paul Fuller wrote:

> I'm getting the impression that 'Invisible' is a large pile of match 
> boxes filled with random numbers of beans.  Every now and then he/it 
> makes an interesting observation followed by often incorrect statements.
> 
> We are gradually teaching he/it about the Universe.
> 
> One day true match box intelligence will rise up.  I expect it to be 
> speaking Haskell.

By that definition, it might have risen up already. Speaking Haskell, 
who would know the difference? :-P

Post a reply to this message