On Mon, 10 May 2010 20:08:30 -0700, Neeum Zawan wrote:
> On 05/09/10 19:29, Jim Henderson wrote:>> It's always been the case that books couldn't be considered reliable.>> Just read any history book and see if it tells *both* sides (history>> books are typically written by the winners, not the losers).> > Only two sides?
Fair point, but underscores the point I was making. :-)
Jim
