Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> Sabrina Kilian wrote:
>> Now, they mention
>> YouTube, and I suppose since currently YouTube does both encode from any
>> video type to h.264 and then display through a decoder that they are
>> distrubting, their flash player, that they might be liable to pay a
>> license as well.
> 
> Youtube doesn't distribute a video decoder. Flash has it built-in, so it's 
> Adobe who is distributing the decoder.
> 

So Adobe pays the license, it still isn't the end user's responsibility.

Post a reply to this message