|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
>> 1. My camera doesn't offer RAW format anyway.
>
> The same technique can be applied to JPEG as well, but you will run into
> posterization much sooner.
Indeed, I quickly discovered that it's usually hopeless to try.
>> 2. Isn't under-exposure equally as bad as over-exposure?
>
> A slight under-exposure can usually be compensated for in
> post-processing without too much quality loss. With over-exposure, some
> detail is generally lost.
A slight anything is better than a drastic something. ;-)
If the image is too under-exposed, bits of it will be pure black. Same
problem as if it's over-exposed.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |