>> 1. My camera doesn't offer RAW format anyway.
> 
> The same technique can be applied to JPEG as well, but you will run into 
> posterization much sooner.

Indeed, I quickly discovered that it's usually hopeless to try.

>> 2. Isn't under-exposure equally as bad as over-exposure?
> 
> A slight under-exposure can usually be compensated for in 
> post-processing without too much quality loss. With over-exposure, some 
> detail is generally lost.

A slight anything is better than a drastic something. ;-)

If the image is too under-exposed, bits of it will be pure black. Same 
problem as if it's over-exposed.

Post a reply to this message