Sabrina Kilian wrote:
> Now, they mention
> YouTube, and I suppose since currently YouTube does both encode from any
> video type to h.264 and then display through a decoder that they are
> distrubting, their flash player, that they might be liable to pay a
> license as well.

Youtube doesn't distribute a video decoder. Flash has it built-in, so it's 
Adobe who is distributing the decoder.

Post a reply to this message