Darren New wrote:
> Kevin Wampler wrote:
>> will be noticeably (potentially significantly) deblurred (at least for 
>> camera shake, defocus works less well).
> 
> I would think the kernel for defocus would be different at each pixel, 
> depending on the original depth from that pixel through the lens to 
> whatever you're seeing there, yes?

Indeed, but even if everything was all at the same depth the kernel of a 
defocus filter tends to be shaped such that reconstruction is less 
accurate due to floating-point resolution issues (although since the 
kernel is generally simple it's much easier to implement).

If things are at different depths then as you say it's a harder problem. 
  Ditto for motion blur when parallax matters or there are independently 
moving or non-rigid objects in the scene.

Post a reply to this message