|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Thu, 06 May 2010 18:00:07 +0200, Fredrik Eriksson wrote:
> Also, the raw data has a higher bit-depth than a JPEG, typically 12 or
> 14 versus lossy compressed 8. This gives you more leeway for making
> adjustments without getting posterization.
That makes sense to me - thanks!
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |