|
|
On Wed, 05 May 2010 09:53:59 +0100, Invisible wrote:
>>> Hell, *my* 3 MP camera would never, ever take a picture like that, no
>>> matter how perfect the lighting or how close up you were. The sensor
>>> just isn't of high enough quality.
>>
>> If it was bright enough and you were a metre or two away from the
>> action then even a cheap consumer digital camera should give a pretty
>> decent image:
>>
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/visithra/321853035/
>>
>> That one was taken with a Canon A620.
>
> Well, try this:
>
> http://www.orphi.me.uk/rev1/04-Photos/2007-04-14/DSCF0064.html
>
> That's probably a metre or two away, it's a dazzlingly bright June
> afternoon, and the image sucks. It's flat and utterly devoid of colour.
It's not a function of the sensor, look what a couple seconds of
postprocessing in GIMP shows.
http://www.imagebam.com/image/7b757979306284
I increased the colour saturation and adjusted the brightness/contrast a
little. Took < 10 seconds to do.
> http://www.orphi.me.uk/rev1/04-Photos/2007-04-14/DSCF0011.html
http://www.imagebam.com/image/24509579306856
Almost the same adjustments on this one.
> There's no way my camera would ever capture the lush colours and sharp
> edges of the images you show.
Well, I'd disagree.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
|