|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On Tue, 04 May 2010 14:58:00 -0400, Warp wrote:
> Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospam com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 04 May 2010 08:06:58 -0400, Warp wrote:
>
>> > Well, maybe I am stupid for assuming that people can have a
>> > rational
>> > conversation even if the subject happens to contain the term "race".
>
>> No, but you assume that what you're writing and what people are reading
>> are the same thing, and when people try to get you to clarify what
>> you're saying because it isn't making sense, you assume that the READER
>> is either stupid or trying to twist your words, and then you launch an
>> attack on them.
>
> I have said several times what I mean, but you keep going on and on
> with
> the same "you defend putting people in jail because of being brown"
> bullshit. It's like you read only what you want to read. Then you accuse
> me of "launching an attack" or whatever.
That's because you keep saying "profiling based on race isn't a problem"
and then claim - quite counterintuitively, that you don't see race. You
sound like Stephen Colbert, except that he's engaging in *satire* and I
don't think you are.
>> What we have here is a failure to communicate. Plain and simple. You
>> simply refuse to acknowledge that you play a role in this failure to
>> communicate, and that everyone ELSE must be stupid.
>
> See, here we go again. You are putting words in my mouth. Words I have
> never said. This is your idea of "communication"?
Oh FFS, I AM NOT PUTTING WORDS IN YOUR MOUTH.
Jim
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |