Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> On Tue, 04 May 2010 08:08:39 -0400, Warp wrote:

> > Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> >> >   As I said, the police checks random drivers here, and I don't see
> >> >   it as a
> >> > bad thing. Hence it's not *always* a bad thing.
> > 
> >> And over here that's not the way law enforcement generally works.  You
> >> seem to trust your government; over here, we tend not to.
> > 
> >   I honestly fail to see how random sobriety testing is a trust issue.

> What Darren said.  Again we have a failure to communicate.  You want to 
> admit to your part in it, or continue to assert that everyone who doesn't 
> agree with you is stupid?

  Where did that come from? Where did you conjure this "stupidity" thing all
of a sudden? Exactly what in my sentence above implies anything like that?

  Is this your idea of "communication"?

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message