|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Darren New <dne### [at] san rr com> wrote:
> Warp wrote:
> > If the distinguishing
> > feature happens to be ethnicity, that doesn't change anything.
> Except it's not. The best distinguishing feature is probable cause. That's
> why they call it that.
That may be so, but it doesn't invalidate what I said. I said "*if* the
distinguishing feature happens to be ethnicity". I didn't claim it *is*.
Try to finally get your thick skull out of the "Arizona law" thing and read
what I'm writing.
> I'm confused. The only distinguishing feature you have mentioned in this
> whole thread is ethnicity, and my bringing up other distinguishing features
> is called "outrageous", and we're talking about how to catch criminals.
What the fuck are you talking about?
Do you have reading comprehension problems? Do you have a hard time
understanding the difference between an expression like "if the
distinguishing feature is ethnicity" and "the distinguishing feature
is ethnicity"?
And where have I use the word "outrageous", and what does it have to
do with anything?
> Maybe you're not racist. But it sure as heck sounds like you're condoning
> racist behavior on the part of the police here, in the name of efficiency.
Then maybe you should learn to read.
I don't appreciate you insulting me like that, so I suppose you just can
go fuck yourself.
--
- Warp
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |