Warp wrote:
>> You're arguing that based on statistics, racist testing should be applied.
>   That's a different context, not related to this sobriety test example.

Fair enough.

>   Also, I don't appreciate your denigrating terminology on what I may be
> arguing for.

Well, when you say "we should test people who look like illegal immigrants 
look", then that's pretty much the textbook definition of racist. You're 
saying "we should act as if those with the same genetics as criminals are 
more likely to also be criminals" is racist.  I don't know any other word 
for it, especially when you're claiming that genetics is a factor, but not 
religion or shopping habits or anything like that.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Linux: Now bringing the quality and usability of
   open source desktop apps to your personal electronics.

Post a reply to this message