Warp wrote:
>   That doesn't mean that testing random people for citizenship is right.
> It means that the *argument* that general random testing is wrong is invalid.

Except we aren't talking about random testing. You're arguing that based on 
statistics, racist testing should be applied.

>   (Of course *you* might disagree with random sobriety tests not being wrong,
> but in Finland nobody is complaining, so I'm not the only one who agrees that
> they are important.)

People complained less about random testing than about racists testing here too.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Linux: Now bringing the quality and usability of
   open source desktop apps to your personal electronics.

Post a reply to this message