POV-Ray : Newsgroups : povray.off-topic : Bl**dy election (part 2) : Re: Bl**dy election (part 2) Server Time
5 Sep 2024 05:24:10 EDT (-0400)
  Re: Bl**dy election (part 2)  
From: Warp
Date: 2 May 2010 14:41:47
Message: <4bddc76b@news.povray.org>
andrel <byt### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> On 2-5-2010 9:07, Warp wrote:
> > Darren New <dne### [at] sanrrcom> wrote:
> >> Warp wrote:
> >>>   If he is an illegal immigrant, why should the country he illegally
> >>> entered take responsibility? It's his own country's problem.
> > 
> >> I think it's more a matter of "what are you going to do?"  If the country 
> >> won't take him back, it's not like you can leave him in a cardboard box on 
> >> the front step.
> > 
> >   You send him to his own country's airport and let them decide what to do
> > with him. Give him the phone number of Amnesty International.
> > 
> Just never, ever go into politics, please.

  I'm sorry, but I don't understand.

  A person enters country X illegally, without permission. Hence country X
deports him back to his own country Y. Country Y forbids its own citizen
from entering its borders (which in my books is a clear violation of
international basic human rights). This is somehow the responsibility of
country X, and now *they* have to take him back and feed him?

  Exactly how does this make any sense? Why does country X have to pay for
this illegal emigrant, just because it chose that country X? Why does country
X become responsible for him so that they have to spend their tax money on
feeding him? If this illegal emigrant had chosen another country Z instead,
it would now by the responsibility of Z to feed him? How exactly does that
make any sense? What has X or Z made to deserve this burden? Shouldn't the
emigrant's own home country Y be responsible for the burden? It's *their*
citizen.

  What happens if instead of one emigrant it's one million emigrants, all
of who illegally enter country X? Is country X still responsible for their
well-being if their country of origin forbids them from coming back? Why
is country X suddenly responsible for one million non-citizens who entered
their borders illegally?

  Do you know what sounds more like? An invasion. Why should country X have
to accept that?

  I'm sorry, but if your politics consist of ideas like "the country who
the illegal immigrant succeeded in entering becomes responsible for feeding
him", then I honestly wouldn't want that kind of politics. Please never,
ever go into politics, thank you very much.

-- 
                                                          - Warp


Post a reply to this message

Copyright 2003-2023 Persistence of Vision Raytracer Pty. Ltd.