andrel <byt### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> >> There is another way that even takes less time and is not illegal 
> >> because of various international laws: don't question people unless you 
> >> have a serious reason to believe that they are illegal (or you are 
> >> questioning them anyway because of a non-related suspicion or check).
> > 
> >   And then watch illegal immigration raise. Right.

> Wrong.

  The police should stop looking for illegal immigrants, and that will not
cause illegal immigration to raise? Can you give some kind of explanation
how that works?

  Maybe you should awaken to the real world. If a country gets a fame of
being very lenient on enforcing its immigration laws, the word *will* spread
and people *will* try to get to that country because, once they are inside,
it's unlikely they will ever get caught and deported.

  And if enforcing the laws is indeed lenient, they will be successful, and
the amount of illegal immigrants will inevitably raise.

> >   It's better to allow illegal immigration than to possibly offend someone.

> It it not about offence, it is about human rights and/or the local law.

  It still sounds to me like "the police should stop checking primarily
Mexican-looking people because it's racism and it offends them".

> >   If find your argument that "the police should not be looking for the
> > illegal immigrant because doing so might offend someone" even more
> > disturbing.

> They have all the right to do so, just not based on looks alone.

  Basically, this is pragmatism vs. political correctness.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message