|
|
On 01/05/2010 10:18 PM, andrel wrote:
> On 1-5-2010 22:38, Warp wrote:
>> Stephen <mca### [at] aoldotcom> wrote:
>>>> How about explaining it clearly rather than giving some odd hints that
>>>> one must keep guessing?
>>>>
>>
>>> No because if I do you will just argue the point. I???m not into
>>> debating but if, after thinking about it and you still cannot work
>>> out or guess what I meant. I will spell it out.
>>
>> Well, if you are not going to explain yourself, I suppose it's impossible
>> to continue the conversation.
>
> I am not Stephen ;)
True ;-)
> but he might have meant something like:
>
> What you are proposing
> - is not effective
> - is often not possible at all
> - will violate rights of legal citizens
> - will harm trust in the police and the juridical system
> - will increase racial tension
> - could become a factor in racial violence
>
> For these and a number of other reasons legislators all over the world
> have decided it is not a good idea and made it illegal. Although it
> seems a good idea at first sight, if you think a little longer you will
> understand why it will destabilize the society more than it solves
> illegal immigration.
>
> At least something like that would be my best guess.
>
>
Good guess and said better than I could but I just don't want anyone to
live in a Nazi state.
--
Best Regards,
Stephen
Post a reply to this message
|
|