On 01/05/2010 9:37 PM, Warp wrote:
> Stephen<mca### [at] aoldotcom>  wrote:
>> On 01/05/2010 8:51 PM, Warp wrote:
>>>>>   We are talking about America here where everyone looks different from
>>>>>   the natives.
>>>     People really love to nitpick on my choice of words there, don't they?
>>>
>
>> Yes.
>
>>>     How about trying to understand what I*mean*  for a chance? It's not that
>>> hard.
>>>
>
>> But we do understand what you mean ;-)
>
>    So it *is* intentional nitpicking? What for?

No, not intentional nitpicking.
What for, cause you don't understand what I mean, when I've explained it.

>
>>>>>>   >       You can call it racism if you want. That will not change the facts.
>>>>>   I wouldn't call it racism since it is you but I would call it ill
>>>>>   informed and stupid.
>>>     Exactly what is ill informed and stupid?
>>>
>
>> You are still young and don???t have the experience of different cultures
>> and societies. So your viewpoint is limited by comparison.
>
>    I'm scratching my head here. Does experience of different cultures and
> societies somehow lead to the opinion that law enforcement should be made
> more lenient when dealing with illegal immigration?
>
>    Let me ask you a few questions:
>
> 1) Do you agree that it's unfeasible for a country to open its borders
>     completely so that anybody can immigrate without any limits, and thus
>     immigration laws are a necessity?
>


Yes.

> 2) If yes, do you agree that entering a country without permission is a
>     crime?
>

Yes.

> 3) If yes, do you agree that criminals should be arrested and the proper
>     punishment applied, such as returning the illegal immigrant to his
>     country of origin?
>

Maybe, maybe not.

> 4) Do you agree that police forces have quite limited resources (most of
>     which comes from taxpayers' money), and that those resources should be
>     used as efficiently as possible, rather than wasted on useless pursuits?
>

Yes, mostly.

>    If you answered yes to all those questions, then what exactly is it that
> you are disagreeing with? That's all I am arguing here.
>

The proposition that humans should behave as machines without any sense 
of judgment, compassion or taking circumstances into consideration.
Heaven help us if we all got our just deserts.

-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message