Am 30.04.2010 16:14, schrieb Jim Holsenback:
> On 04/30/2010 09:52 AM, clipka wrote:
>> My personal vote would be to fix it nonetheless, to end up like shown in
>> the attached image (2). (And yes, that's bicubic interpolation you see
>> in the "interpolate 3" field.)
>
> I guess that explains your recent Wiki activity! I'd vote yes as well
> ...if it means picking up the bicubic feature while you're at it :-)

I can add the bicubic feature without changing the old interpolation 
methods' behavior, so no conditionals here please ;-)

Post a reply to this message