On 04/30/2010 09:52 AM, clipka wrote:
> My personal vote would be to fix it nonetheless, to end up like shown in> the attached image (2). (And yes, that's bicubic interpolation you see> in the "interpolate 3" field.)
I guess that explains your recent Wiki activity! I'd vote yes as well
...if it means picking up the bicubic feature while you're at it :-)
