|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
>> (And hell, half the equipment and content that says "HD" on it isn't
>> even full resolution anyway... Why allow half a dozen resolutions when
>> it would have been far simpler for the designers and less misleading
>> for the public if they allow only one resolution?)
>
> Because, say, games at full HD may have to cut geometry or frame rate
> here and there to fit comfortably?
What do TV resolutions have to do with computers? You connect a computer
to a monitor, not a TV.
>> PS. I am similarly baffled by the current fashion for "widescreen"
>> TVs. Given that 99.998% of all video content ever created is in 4:3
>> aspect, what the hell is the advantage of buying a TV with a 16:9
>> aspect?? I don't understand.
>
> Yeah, why sell color TVs in a time when 99.98% video content ever
> created is B&W? This is one of your "obviously impossible" kinda
> comments, ain't it?
What, you think just because everybody is being forced to buy widescreen
TVs, people are going to start filming in widescreen?
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |