On 04/26/2010 07:11 PM, Tim Cook wrote:
> The correction noted for
> pass_through for photons doesn't really make much sense to be called
> pass_through, though, if the photons are still being affected by the
> object.

Cool ... then I'm not the only one. I was struggling with how to add
changes into 3.7 documentation for this and all I could come up with was
WTF!!! Needless to say I put it on my to-do list and moved onto
something else. I've got a feeling that this is a WIP and anything that
I would have been able to come up with is going to change ;-)

Jim

Post a reply to this message