|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
clipka escreveu:
> Am 26.04.2010 21:33, schrieb Warp:
>> Le_Forgeron<jgr### [at] free fr> wrote:
>>> Then came out LCD... from laptop to desktop and TV, they killed the CRT.
>>> The colours drop to less numbers, but this is now an hidden information.
>>
>> Not to talk about contrast...
>>
>> Also, CRTs could be looked at from about any direction and it would
>> always look exactly as good. Only in the last few years LCDs are
>> *approaching* that (many still have problems when viewed from above
>> or below).
>>
>> Then there are the dead pixels, which plagued LCDs for many, many
>> years
>> (only relatively recently LCD vendors have started guaranteeing no dead
>> pixels).
>
> Stick to CRTs if you like - I do prefer to have room enough on my desk
> for /two/ displays with 24" @16:9 and 19" @4:3 size (effective image
> diagonal, not nominal tube size), both presenting their image perfectly
> flat and undistorted, with perfectly sharp pixels, no analog signal
> distortion or beam focus problems, no "pumping" effect with brightness
> changes, no moiree effects with the X11 login screen, less dust
> accumulating on the display, less eye strain from flicker - and no risk
> of my desk collapsing under the displays' sheer weight.
>
> It's all a question of priorities. Yours may vary.
thank you. Saved my time. :)
--
a game sig: http://tinyurl.com/d3rxz9
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |