|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
andrel wrote:
> On 20-4-2010 6:02, Darren New wrote:
>> Kevin Wampler wrote:
>>> Ahh, I did not understand that was the point you were making. Of
>>> course even so then there's still cephalopod eyes and such that would
>>> need actual design.
>>
>> Nah. They're obviously inferior to the eyes God made in His own image.
>> Otherwise, God's eyes wouldn't be the best, and God would thus be
>> imperfect, right? Hence, they're merely God's eyes with imperfections
>> added in. ;-)
>
> You mean imperfections like letting the light pass through a layer of
> vasculature and horizontal cells before reaching the photosensitive cells?
Yes, exactly.
> IIRC the octopus eye is much better designed than a human one
... so to speak.
> and many a
> vertebrate eye is more sensitive than ours but that is probably not the
> point you are making.
Right.
Altho "Mr. Deity" had a funny line...
Skeptic: "If you're trying to use intelligent design to reveal yourself, why
would you put a blind spot in the eye?"
Deity: "Where else would I put a blind spot?"
--
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
Linux: Now bringing the quality and usability of
open source desktop apps to your personal electronics.
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |