|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
Darren New wrote:
> somebody wrote:
>> In fact, I don't think any major sects believe that God is
>> physical in the sense we come to understand it,
>
> Maybe not any more. Certainly when he was walking around the Garden
> looking for Adam and Eve he was.
Unless that is an analogy using the words that come closest to what God
was doing.
> And he wasn't omniscient or he wouldn't have been calling out trying
> to find them. :-)
By that reasoning, math teachers don't know what two plus two is.
>> so the whole "in his image" business needs a deeper understanding
>
> Certainly. But then, if we aren't like him physically, and we weren't
> created in his moral image, and we are still incapable of understanding
> how he thinks, in what sense are we his image?
We *were* created in His moral image, that of sinless perfection. But
all of us have blown it through sin.
Regards,
John
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |