Darren New wrote:
> somebody wrote:
>> In fact, I don't think any major sects believe that God is
>> physical in the sense we come to understand it, 
> 
> Maybe not any more. Certainly when he was walking around the Garden 
> looking for Adam and Eve he was.

Unless that is an analogy using the words that come closest to what God 
was doing.

> And he wasn't omniscient or he wouldn't have been calling out trying
 > to find them. :-)

By that reasoning, math teachers don't know what two plus two is.

>> so the whole "in his image" business needs a deeper understanding 
> 
> Certainly. But then, if we aren't like him physically, and we weren't 
> created in his moral image, and we are still incapable of understanding 
> how he thinks, in what sense are we his image?

We *were* created in His moral image, that of sinless perfection.  But 
all of us have blown it through sin.

Regards,
John

Post a reply to this message