Warp wrote:
> Jim Holsenback <jho### [at] povrayorg> wrote:
>> but whats up with the cubic warp? Should it go here:
> 
>>
http://wiki.povray.org/content/Documentation:Reference_Section_5.6#Mapping_using_warps
> 
>   I'd say it's rather obvious.

well if it was THAT obvious I wouldn't have asked ... I'm not prone to 
waste time (mine or others) when asking seems like to correct thing to do.

> 
>> and or here:
> 
>>
http://wiki.povray.org/content/Documentation:Reference_Section_5.6#The_map_type_Option
> 
>   Why would it go there? The cubic warp has nothing to do with image mapping
> types.

the descriptive passage in the change log seemed awfully vague to me! 
hey we can't all be as sharp as you ;-)

>> I already see an entry for the "cubic" keyword that links someplace 
>> else! Conflict or does parse phase associate those properly?
> 
>   The same keyword can be used for different purposes in different contexts.

yes I thought that might be the case ... thanks for the clarification.

>   If you want to make a list of keywords such that the keyword is a link
> to the pertinent documentation, you should make several entries in such a
> list, like:
> 
> - cubic (primitive)
> - cubic (list pattern)
> - cubic (warp)

a worthy idea ... danke

(thinking out loud) ... am i the only one who thinks that you can be 
rather snide with some of your replies? have a cookie ... smile more 
often. trust me it'll do wonders for your disposition.

Cheers

Post a reply to this message