Invisible wrote:
> It wasn't an entirely serious suggestion. (Although you could probably 
> make it work. Just have the functions point to the state you want them 
> to mutate...)

We already have that. We call them "objects". ;-)

No, seriously, what do you think a pointer to an array of closures all 
referencing the same variable is?

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Yes, we're traveling together,
   but to different destinations.

Post a reply to this message