clipka wrote:

> As far as I understand, Warp's suggestion is merely making the setting 
> available for non-fading light sources as well 

ah I see. Of course, fade_cutoff_distance does not depend
on fade_power, so it also works for fade_power 0. It may raise
the question of whether the name should begin with "fade_".
But it could be seen as a special form of fading. Especially
if the same keyword were to be used for interior attenuation.

Post a reply to this message