On 05/04/2010 8:03 PM, Le_Forgeron wrote:
> repeat is currently used in warp, so it might be best to avoid it.
> And it should be a name, which "repeat" is not.
>
> due to mathematical background about infinity, what about:
> aleph1, aleph2&  aleph3 ?
> (well, strictly, the first one would be aleph0, but the number might be
> clearer as the dimension... or not, aleph0/1/2 might be fine too)
>
> duplicate ?
> replica ?
>

How about, say_again, say_again_again, say_again_again_again? :-)

-- 

Best Regards,
	Stephen

Post a reply to this message