Patrick Elliott wrote:
> For something like this, you need "consistency". 

Great. Pass an amendment.  That's how it works. :-)

> Its not about bloody property taxes, its about one single, consistent, 
> nation wide, way of securing the health, as much as possible, of *every* 
> citizen, not just which ever states, cities, or non-corp owned plots of 
> land, just happen to pass something that tries to fix the problem.

I understand that you *want* that. I want it too. But it's perfectly 
reasonable for a state government to say "that's not your job, Uncle Sam."

> Its not about who does it. 

Actually, yeah, it is. At least in *this* lawsuit.

Note that I'm not commenting on the appropriateness of health care reform 
etc. I'm commenting on the fact that it's perfectly reasonable for states to 
do something while complaining the feds should not be doing that.

-- 
Darren New, San Diego CA, USA (PST)
   Yes, we're traveling together,
   but to different destinations.

Post a reply to this message