Jim Henderson <nos### [at] nospamcom> wrote:
> That's easily demonstrable by taking any court case where more than one 
> eyewitness produces a differing set of events.  Who do you believe if 
> they both can't be right?

  That makes it easy. The problems start when two eyewitnesses give the
same testimony... which happens to be wrong.

> >   For some reason most people also keep anecdotal evidence in high
> >   regard,
> > up to it being more credible than actual physical tests.

> I would disagree with that based on what I wrote above. :-)

  I said "most people", not "courts of law".

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message