On Sun, 28 Mar 2010 03:17:52 -0700, somebody wrote:

>  anectodal evidence

Something of an oxymoron there; anecdotes do not make for (scientific) 
*evidence*.  This is something that I've had to explain to my own 
management a few times:  Two people saying a training course is bad (or 
good) isn't the basis for doing (or not doing) a rewrite of the course.  
A statistically large enough sample of those who have used the materials 
*is*.

Jim

Post a reply to this message