Stephen wrote:
> On 27/03/2010 9:38 PM, andrel wrote:
>> Shouldn't that be > 0?
>> A value of less than zero would imply negative lighting.
> 
> Probably, but you have not seen my hair :-P (My one vanity)
> I’m sure it reflects in the UV range. LOL
> 
> Anyway saying “< 0” is the good Doctor’s way of saying it is a very long
> way from black.
> 
> 
You're both right. I meant to type < 1 but my fingers got mixed up. I
then decided that < 0 expressed my meaning better.

John
-- 
Cogito sum,|| wbu### [at] tznvypbz (rot'ed) || GPG Key Fingerprint:
ergo sum,  ||   These opinions are mine alone,   || 0D9BCF4CF1B71CA2F5F7
cogito     ||     others can find their own      || BFBBCBC34EDEAEFCE453

Post a reply to this message