|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
On 03/26/10 23:15, Warp wrote:
>> You could simply go a step further and blame a lot of authorities for
>> giving good reasons to mistrust them.
>
> In this case "authority" would be regular, official medical practice. What
> have they done to earn people's mistrust? Why is quackery more trustworthy
> in the eyes of many people?
Well, in the US, it wouldn't be doctors, but either the FDA, or the
medical research community, or both.
I can't come up with reasons to distrust them, though. The FDA sucks
for food, but is probably quite good on medicine.
I think the main problem with those folks, though, is that they easily
generalize from legitimately distrusting n groups in authority to
"Authorities always work for vested interests".
The only difference between their stance and yours is that you're being
a bit more granular. (Which is not an irrelevant difference).
--
"Hex Dump" - Where Witches put used Curses?
Post a reply to this message
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |