On 03/25/10 06:45, scott wrote:
>> MDs don't know everything. Sometimes they disagree. Sometimes it is
>> like a game of chance -
> 
> Sure, but I don't think any of those cases you mentioned are similar to
> the original story.

	Yes. So my question is: How do you draft the regulations to catch what
was in the original story and not what TC is describing?

	It's not irrelevant. He's describing a case where a parent opted no
treatment whatsoever for a condition the medical field seemed to think
warranted treatment. Should his father have been tried for it?

-- 
Mary had a little lamb, a little beef, and a little ham.

Post a reply to this message