> Can someone help me understand the objection.  Is it a question of 
> tackiness--
> maybe even snootiness that it's an "old" technique?  Or does it actually 
> hamper
> some users from accessing material?  In the scenario I'm thinking about 
> it's
> better to be tacky & universally accessible than bleeding edge.

It's impossible to bookmark the page or copy/send a link if any of the 
frames have been changed (eg you followed a link inside a frame).

And I heard that search engines ignore them (as in totally ignore, you're 
pages won't get indexed).

Post a reply to this message