Nicolas Alvarez <nic### [at] gmailcom> wrote:
> Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> > Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> >> Orchid XP v8 wrote:
> >>> (And that of course is the other undesirable thing about digital TV.
> >>> There used to be, like, 5 channels, 4 of them containing high quality
> >>> programming. Now there's 500 channels and they're *all* showing utter
> >>> crap that nobody would ever want to watch...)
> >> 
> >> That has nothing to do with digital TV. It's just the drop of quality
> >> programming happened at the same time. Correlation != causation.
> > 
> > The increase in available channels isn't related to the decrease in
> > signal bandwidth per channel due to being digital?

> I'm talking about *bad TV shows*, not bad image quality.

  I think that the point was that the increase in number of channels lowered
the average TV program quality because the majority of it is just filler.

-- 
                                                          - Warp

Post a reply to this message