> Ah but if you accept that we're simply rationalising actions already 
> determined by our unconscious the chemical reactions that make you want to 
> rob the store were countered/blocked by chemical reactions that stopped 
> you. In the  case of those who did rob the store said counter-reactions 
> simply weren't strong enough and whose fault is that?

It doesn't matter so much whose fault it is, just that something should be 
done to ensure that in the future that person has strong enough counter 
reactions to stop them robbing the store.  Making that person pay some money 
or sit in jail for a while can have that effect.

Post a reply to this message