> Ah but if you accept that we're simply rationalising actions already
> determined by our unconscious the chemical reactions that make you want to
> rob the store were countered/blocked by chemical reactions that stopped
> you. In the case of those who did rob the store said counter-reactions
> simply weren't strong enough and whose fault is that?
It doesn't matter so much whose fault it is, just that something should be
done to ensure that in the future that person has strong enough counter
reactions to stop them robbing the store. Making that person pay some money
or sit in jail for a while can have that effect.
Post a reply to this message
|