>> What would be an improvement is to start recording at a higher frame
>> rate.
>
> Yeah, that too. Wasn't 24 FPS chosen because it's the *minimum* frame rate
> that yields a believable illusion of motion?
Yup, IIRC the maximum (ie above that you don't really notice any difference)
is somewhere around 100 Hz.
I wonder how long before LCD makers start marketing their high framerate TV
technology in computer monitors? The hard core gamers should like it.
Post a reply to this message
|