>> What would be an improvement is to start recording at a higher frame 
>> rate.
>
> Yeah, that too. Wasn't 24 FPS chosen because it's the *minimum* frame rate 
> that yields a believable illusion of motion?

Yup, IIRC the maximum (ie above that you don't really notice any difference) 
is somewhere around 100 Hz.

I wonder how long before LCD makers start marketing their high framerate TV 
technology in computer monitors?  The hard core gamers should like it.

Post a reply to this message